Published by Mr. Ajay Maken, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha. Independent analysis of official CPCB monitoring data. Data compiled by CREA, with our thanks for its work in creating awareness. CREA has no involvement in this site. Contact: ajaymaken@mycleanair.in

Report · 23 July 2026

Delhi's air looks -8 points vs last year on the meter, but that is the weather's work. Remove it, and the city is +22 points worse than last year. The improvement belongs to the weather, not to policy. Today's reading itself is weather-flattered by about 25 points.

+22.5
AQI points worse than last year
PM10 weather removed
6 / 6
Pollutants with no improvement
of those measured today
151
AQI at the worst station
R K Puram, Moderate
Analysis window: 10 AM 22nd July to 10 AM 23rd July
Baseline: YoY baseline: avg of 16th Jul - 30th Jul 2025 (same +/-7 days), matched stations

Today's full report

Roughly twelve pages: the verdict on today's air, every monitoring station, the weather versus policy attribution, the full year of de-weathered trends, and the annexures behind each number.

Download the daily reportPDF, 0.6 MB
Narrated in Hindi. Runs 118 seconds.

The findings

What today's report says

Against the world standard
Even after removing the weather's help, Delhi's fine-particle level (PM2.5) is 44 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m³), which is 3.0× the WHO safe limit of 15. The worst weather-corrected hotspot is Wazirpur at 50 µg/m³, which is 3.3× the WHO limit.
How widespread
After weather correction, 30 of 30 comparable stations are worse than last year; the typical station is 24 AQI points higher. This is a city-wide rise, not a few bad spots.
Honesty box
On days it has never seen, the weather-correction model explains about 37% of the variation, so we treat its outputs as estimates, not exact points. The weather-corrected year-on-year change for fine particles is measured to within roughly ±2 percentage points of sampling error, before model uncertainty. Gas data carries documented unit-inconsistency (peer-reviewed international research, 2025); we lead on the reliable PM2.5/PM10. Percentages compare the same stations in both years; single-day observed spikes are never used as the headline.
PM2.5
Weather-corrected claims allowed (model skill adequate) · PM10: weather-corrected claims allowed (model skill adequate) · NO2: direction reliable (same stations + units both years); absolute levels carry the units caveat · NOx: not part of CPCB's AQI, and the weather model is weak here, so we report observed facts only · SO2: the weather model is too weak to separate weather from policy, so we report observed facts only · CO: the weather model is too weak to separate weather from policy, so we report observed facts only · Ozone: rising ozone chemically signals falling traffic NO2 (standing rule: excluded so it can never be spun as 'transport improved')
Above the world standard today
PM2.5: 37 of 42 stations above the WHO daily limit as observed; even after weather correction, 42 of 42 remain above it. PM10: 37 of 44 stations above the WHO daily limit as observed; even after weather correction, 44 of 44 remain above it. (Weather-model matched panel.)

A caution we publish daily

Gas data carries documented unit-inconsistency (peer-reviewed international research, 2025); we lead on the reliable PM2.5/PM10.

Back to the daily archive